Association Stress Reduction

In the world of Association’s we are consistantly on stress ‘overload’ Member expectations outweigh an Association’s ability to perform. With the new economy most if not all Associations are leaner and we all seemed to be juggling alot of assignments. I don’t think this is going to change overnight and as a result combined with a number of of items many of us are stressed to the max!

We know we are not going to eliminate stress however there are methods of reducing it, here are just a few:
* Make a list of 10 promises you have made to others that are causing you stress, even if it’s stress you can handle. Revoke all 10 and work out more reasonable alternatives, do it today…..
* Completely resolve any legal, tax or finincial clouds or problems.
* If you are not earning enough money for your efforts, make a plan to do so. Get help where needed.
* Exercise each day
* Learn how to meditate, start with just 5 minutes a day…….

There are lots of ways to reduce your stress, perhaps you need to revist your role in the organization, perhaps its time to ‘buff up’ your resume. Extreme self care and support from experts is essential.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Rules for Debate

There are times when individuals speak over and over on one debatable issue, even if their meeting rules of order follow Roberts Rules of Order. ( Sometimes Board Chairs do not realize that, according to Roberts Rules there is a defined amount of time and amount of times a Board Member may speak)

So, referring to Roberts Rules of Order, 10th ed page 375 the following applies:

You may speak in debate on any debatable motion on the same day. Each of these 2 times, you can speak up to 10 minutes. You cannot ‘save’ time or transfer it to someone else.

Note: Some organizations have made special privileges within their bylaws to expand upon the amount of times an individual may speak on one subject. This special privileges inserted into bylaws is really quite rare.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Reccommended Reading ASSOCIATION Magazine

Every two months I received a publication in the mail, THE ASSOCIATION. It is Canada’s only Association Magazine and is packed full of valuable, timely articles. The isuue I received today focuses on Money and Risk. There are featured articles on Mitigating Risk, Employee Fraud, Financial Stewardship and The Operating Surplus. Have a look at www.associationmagazine.com

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Help, My Board is Driving Me Crazy!!!

With the economy in it’s current state, it’s not uncommon to see not-for-profit leaders overwhelmed and frustrated in their career–in fact, I’ve heard from quite a few folks that they’re switching their career paths altogether. The turnover rate in some of our sectors is overwhelming and life is too short to be micromanaged or not fully appreciated by your Board. Rather than throwing your hands in the air, becoming frustrated and walking away take a minute and give me a call…… There is help and support at Real Board Solutions 1.888.531.5796

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Compensation-Fringe Benefits

Most not-for-profits pay fringe benefits, some much more than others……….
A recent study of business Association has determined that their CEO’s are lagging behind the private sector in a number of areas. The statics’ below for CEO fringe benefits equal approximately $ 6,500 per year. So where you are on the chart, are you receiving the fringe benefit compensation you deserve and how is your fellow CEO’s doing in comparison? The following will be helpful, keep in mind; this is for business Associations and is based upon a salary survey of $ 800 not-for-profit in the business Association sector.

One of my questions however, is some of these items included in the survey not really a ‘need’ in order to operate as a CEO? I question a Board who views a cell phone as a fringe benefit, what do you think?
But look at the chart below for a cell phone; can you imagine not having a cell phone or a laptop? I guess the CEO’s are paying for these necessities on their own…….

Please note, this information below does not include health or retirement benefits. These (especially) the retirement benefits can substantially increase the overall value of a fringe benefit compensation package. I will be providing more details on this tomorrow.

Fringe Benefit Category % of Surveyed CEO’s receiving the Benefit

Time off in lieu of overtime 48%
Home office internet 19%
Cell phone 73%
Club Memberships 10%
Conference registration 73%
Time off for external volunteer roles 19%
Laptop computers 66%
Maternity/paternity enhancements 6%
Use of Airline Points 47%
Educational Assistance Reimbursement 39%
Low interest/no interest loans 2%
Sabbaticals 3%
Fitness Club Memberships 10%
Business Class Airfare 10%
Retirement Counseling 5%

Tomorrow: Health Benefits and Retirement Benefits

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Board Remuneration – Creative Solutions

Board Remuneration – Creative Solutions

By Julie Garland McLellan on September 27, 2011

One of the longest running and most passionately argued debates on LinkedIn concerns the issue of payment for directors of not-for-profit organisation boards. Although the focus of the mainstream press has remained fixed on the high salaries of executive directors and the apparent abuses of performance hurdles so that executives are rewarded for destroying, rather than creating value, the issue of how to remunerate non-executive directors (NEDs) is one that many smaller companies grapple with.

At the ‘top end of town’ the large listed companies pay NEDs a set directors fee, often with a component that is paid into a superannuation fund, which does not vary with corporate performance or other hurdles. The governance codes recognise that performance related pay, with its issues of timing and disclosure, is not appropriate to remunerate the custodians of long term value creation. Many board advisers would advocate provisions to ensure that stock options and performance related remuneration were reserved for the executives and never used for NED remuneration.
However, I prefer to see boards (and, if you can get them into a decision-making forum, shareholders) consider the principle and then adopt the practice that best suits them given the strategy and circumstances of the company. Start-ups and turnarounds often have very limited cash available, and few avenues for raising equity and debt. Those companies need to think very carefully about how they remunerate their NEDs.

There is great value in independence and this is sacrificed if the NEDs have stock and/or options as a significant component of their remuneration. However, if there is not enough cash to attract competent NEDs then the choice of sacrificing independence to gain competence becomes a valid choice. It should not be made lightly or without putting in place some very clear risk management to avoid or reduce the conflicts of interest that will arise.

Companies have gone to IPO with weak boards because they simply would not pay for proper NEDs. These companies rarely prosper. A swift takeover at an almost advantageous price is the best outcome that their unfortunate shareholders can expect. The more normal outcome is a slow process of under-performance and missed opportunities followed by an accelerating process of deterioration as unmanaged risks and poor decisions decrease the value of the company and its stock until it is quietly delisted or suffers an acrimonious takeover in which the shareholders lose almost all the value of their investment. It can be galling to see the NEDs walk away from the disaster claiming they did the best that could be done under the circumstances (which they allowed to eventuate).

There are several good NEDs in the high technology and mining sectors who receive some compensation in the form of stock options. These are often options that vest slowly and result in shares with escrow provisions. In these cases shareholders are generally sophisticated and aware of the risks of the sector and the likely (or unlikely) prospects of success. The shareholders make a rational decision to accept the use of stock to conserve cash and know that this increases some risks whilst managing another. The value and quantum of stock and the hurdles for triggering release are fiercely debated at AGMs and EGMs until a solution is achieved that meets the needs of all concerned. Constitutions, charters and governance practices and structures are specifically designed to manage the conflicts of interest that will inevitably arise.

Remuneration is a complex and nuanced aspect of company strategy and most good boards will have some very serious discussions about it. Good expert advice is needed if you are going to adopt a practice that deviates from general governance recommendations. Excellent disclosure and informed shareholders are required to properly authorize the use of stock as a component of NED remuneration.

Many of the disasters where NEDS have acted from conflicts positions because of the impact to their options or stock holdings have come from companies that did not consider and manage the governance risks and that disclosed it to their shareholders in a minimalist fashion. We should be wary lest many others repeat these disasters. Boards need a governance regime that permits companies use any form of compensation that meets their strategic needs.

Shareholders need a generally accepted good practice; a simple directors fee paid annually in instalments like a salary is probably the simplest solution and creates the least number of risks to be managed. Disclosure and informed markets should support appropriate investment decisions and funds should flow preferentially towards companies with good strategic remuneration policies, at board and executive levels.

What do you think?
______________________________________
Julie Garland-McLellan has been internationally acclaimed as a leading expert on board governance. See her website and LinkedIn profiles, and get her books Dilemmas, Dilemmas: Practical Case Studies for Company Directors and Presenting to Boards.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Association Job Market

This is a partial list of the Association Job Market for January 2012 It has been provided by the CSAE.

For a more complete list or more details on the opportunities below please call us at 1 888 531 5796

Manager, Program & Event Services, York University (Toronto)
Director of Marekting and Member Services, Ontario Medical Assocation (Toronto)
Chief Executive Officer, Building Industry & Land Development Association (Toronto)
Chief Executive Officer, Gymnastics BC (Vancouver)
Manager, Content & Communications, CSAE (Toronto)
Director of Training & Membership Development, Canadian Urban Transit Association (Toronto)
Coordinator, Administration (Bilingual), Canadian Urban Transit Association (Toronto)
Coordinator, Membership (Bilingual), Canadian Urban Transit Association (Toronto)
Chief Executive Officer, Canadian Mental Health Association – York Region (Toronto)
Communications Specialist – Toronto, Motion Picture Association (Toronto)
Chief Executive Officer, Doctors Manitoba (Winnipeg)
Education Manager, Ontario Institute PMAC (Toronto)
Manager, Communications and Regional Programs, The Canadian Payroll Association (Toronto)
Director, Policy and Regulatory Affairs, Canadian Shipowners Association (Ottawa)
Manager, CAE® Program, CSAE (Toronto)
Manager, Organizational Effectiveness, National Association of Federal Retirees (Ottawa)
Director of Corporate Services, Association of Ontario Health Centres (Toronto)
Président-directeur Général, ATR associées du Québec (Québec – ALL)
Executive Director, Canadian Kinesiology Alliance (Canada – ALL)
Director, Communications, National Association of Federal Retirees (Ottawa)
Vice President, Business Solutions & Operational Excellence, B2B Trust (Toronto)
Senior Manager, Corporate Policy, Woodbine Entertainment Group (Toronto)
Executive Vice President, MYTRAK Health Systems Inc. (Mississauga, Ontario)
Government Relations Specialist, Ontario Real Estate Association (Toronto)
Vice President Marketing and Sales, MYTRAK Health Systems Inc. (Mississauga, Ontario)
President & CEO, Canadian Ski Council (Barrie, Ontario)
Manager, Member & Consumer Services, Canadian Standards Association (Toronto)
Membership and Marketing Coordinator, Canadian Water and Wastewater Association (Ottawa)
Manager, Accreditation and Education, Canadian Public Relations Society (Toronto)
CEO, The Alzheimer Society of Toronto (Toronto)
Director, Stakeholder Relations, Rx&D (Ottawa)
Manager, Regional MC & IT, Banff Lake Louise Tourism (Edmonton)
Manager, Policy and Communications, Automotive Industries Association of Canada (Ottawa)
Executive Director, Canadian Society of Landscape Architects (Ottawa)
Account Executive, Base Consulting and Management Inc. (Toronto)
Director, Marketing and Communications, Appraisal Institute of Canada (Ottawa)
Counsellor, Professional Practice, Appraisal Institute of Canada (Ottawa)
Vice President, IT Operations, B2B Trust (Toronto)
Vice President Finance (Senior Financial Offider), Goodwill Industries of Alberta (Edmonton)
Coordinator, Membership and Trade Issues, Canadian Association of Chain Drug Stores (Toronto)
President and CEO, Goodwill Industries of Alberta (Edmonton)
Director, Policy and Communications, New Brunswick Medical Society (Fredericton)
Director, Chapter and Member Services, Confidential (Toronto)
Director, Government Affairs, Canada’s Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (Ottawa)
Director, Government Relations and Advocacy – Ontario, Canadian Diabetes Association (Toronto)
Bilingual Marketing Coordinator, Interior Designers of Canada (Toronto)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Create a Fresh Start for your Non-Dues Revenue Future

Create a Fresh Start for your Non-Dues Revenue Future
by Laurie Ford, PhD

The easiest way to increase association revenue is to increase membership, right? But what if there is limited likelihood of membership growth but you still want to continue providing member-enhancing value? One solution is to develop new ways of providing member value that will add more revenue at the same time.

Creating or increasing your non-dues revenue, also called earned income, is a challenging change to make. This change can mean a substantial investment of staff time and resources, so it needs to be well thought out before you commit. Where do you start?

Three Tasks to Get your Cards on the Table

Take a fresh look at your financial picture. It is worth investing time and brainpower to see that old familiar spreadsheet with new eyes. Doing the following three tasks can refresh your perspective and give you the knowledge to get your board and executive team engaged in productive conversations about new revenue.

1. There are the six major categories of association non-dues revenue. What percent of your revenue comes from each of the following?

Fundraising
Meeting registration fees
Trade show sales
Consulting
Print publications
Showing your association’s revenue in these six categories will help your board and staff to see the revenue streams in a fresh light. It’s okay to use sub-categories to help them see more details, but stick with these major groupings. It might be tempting to skip this step, because you think they already know this perspective – after all, you send them those annual reports, right? Do it anyway, and prepare to be surprised.

2. It takes money to make money. How much does your association spend to bring in each type of revenue? A ballpark figure is good enough for now. Staff time, printing, and computer support are needed for almost every revenue stream. You may have other sizeable expenditures associated with some of your revenue. Come up with an approximate dollar figure for your expenditures associated with each of the six revenue categories.

This information will give you a new understanding of the term “revenue cycle” – it really does cycle in, through, out, and around. You and your board members will get a new appreciation for the way your association expenditures create value, and how that value creates revenue. It will open a discussion that allows you to create more value – and more revenue – by choosing to emphasize the revenue streams that are most effective for you.

3. Is your board on board? Does everyone agree that it’s time to build new or better ways to create more value and bring in new non-dues revenue? If you are the only one who sees the need, then show them the future. Assemble the evidence of financial trends in your area, along with projections of what this means for your association.

What will happen to each of those six categories of non-dues revenue?
What will happen to the expenditures that make those revenue streams possible?
Is your total amount of non-dues revenue growing every year, or is it staying about the same? If revenue is growing, is it keeping pace with inflation?
Create a visual table or graph showing where your association might be five years from now, starting with today’s numbers projecting based on expected trends. Don’t worry about being “exactly right” – nobody knows the future – but use the best information you have about changes in your specialty and economic trends. Remember, you aren’t trying to create a crystal ball, you’re trying to get a good discussion going to create a path to a better future.

Three Tasks to Create a First-Draft Plan for Better Revenue

There are three questions that will help you shape a plan. Each one is good for a discussion by various groupings of board and staff members. The purpose is to get people thinking and talking about making changes in your association’s revenue streams. The discussions raise problems, ideas, and solutions, and they also get more people aligned with the idea of.

1. How much more income do we want? Saying “more” is not enough: you have to be specific.

Do you want an increase of 3-5 percent, 5-10 percent, or more than 10 percent?
In which of the six non-dues revenue categories do you think you can create new revenue that will support your members, either directly or indirectly? What percent increase would you like to see in each area?
What might it cost to make those changes? What might it cost to sustain them?
When people look at finances from this perspective, they begin to imagine a new future. This helps everyone get out of the survival struggle. Of course, they jump into a new struggle: how to build member value and revenue at the same time. But that’s exactly what you want people to be talking about, isn’t it?
2. How can we get what we want? Do we want new products, services, or communications? Do we want new relationships?
Get groups of people talking about the most promising avenues for your unique association. Some ideas:

Could you combine two or more moderately successful products and/or services into a new package that offers more hands-on value for members?
Are there some things you have always included in your membership package that could be dropped without causing problems? Or benefits that could be replaced by something more useful – and more economical – to produce?
Can you modify any existing products or services by extending the variety, depth, or timing? For example, one association added a new educational series by breaking up existing programs into different modules, making them smaller, more easily accessible, and more user-friendly.
What new or improved relationships would help you provide more value, either to members or to people outside the association, for a good revenue return? One association began a partnership with an educational company to improve their marketing effectiveness, reach more customers outside the membership, and provide more convenient delivery. Another association built new relationships with advertisers, arranging to sell more ad space in their directories and on association product and service packages and materials, including internet banner and button ads.
Brainstorming is sometimes overrated, but not in the case of revenue development. Your association already has several different kinds of non-dues revenue. Can you get people talking about adding, combining, or changing what you already produce?
Practice exploring all the options, and think outside your past.

3. Is it mission-relevant? You’ll need to “true up” all the good ideas by making sure that each new revenue plan is related to your association’s mission. It helps to get people talking about real member problems. Find out what you really know about the problems members are facing in their daily work and personal lives.

Do your members have revenue-generating problems of their own? Are there solutions you could help bring to your members? One grocer’s association brought in local marketing companies to help members design a coupon program and a series of community events, bringing more attention to the quality and value of neighborhood stores.
Do your members have business problems with staffing, operations, or financial processes? A review of their business problems might reveal ideas for the design of new products or services. For example, one medical association partnered with an insurance reimbursement firm to help member physicians improve their billing and collection processes.
Do your members share some social or personal challenges that could be met with education or information solutions of some kind? One hospital association offered a series of stress management programs at a variety of locations tailored to specific types of member professions.
Revenue solutions that have nothing to do with your mission will still use your resources. Members have access to lots of benefits from lots of places, and you want them to see you as providing distinctive solutions.
Two Final Tips

Caution: don’t fall for the idea that simply making all your products or services electronic will bring you a quick windfall. Any new revenue initiative takes time, and you want to be sure it fits your board, staff, financial, and member needs.

Focus: it is usually wiser to pick one or two areas to focus on than to try a little of everything. A strong focus will help you build stronger expertise, and get to know which strategies are most effective.

Posting courtesy of Laurie Ford, PhD, a consultant, author, and speaker for organization design, management, and change implementation www.laurieford.com.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Roberts Rules In Plain English-How To Limit Debate

We have all attended meeting where limiting debate is necessary. It may be for an individual who continues to make a point but in fact is saying the same thing over and over- and over and over…………..

The rights of the individual to debate is important. What is more important however is the collective right of the Board for democracy.

When a Board member suspects a situation occuring as above an example of the correct motion is ” I move that the debate on this motion be limited to a period of one speech of two minutes for each member”

Keep in mind that the motion must be seconded and approved by the majority in attandance

An example of a motion to close debate is ‘ I move the debate be closed and the question be put to a vote.

If your bylaws state that the meeting is to be managed by Roberts Rules of Order that means all of Roberts Rules not just a few selected ones

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Association Job Market in Canada

Thanks to the CSAE for providing this information

Executive Director, Canadian Society of Landscape Architects (Ottawa)
Account Executive, Base Consulting and Management Inc. (Toronto)
Director, Marketing and Communications, Appraisal Institute of Canada (Ottawa)
Counsellor, Professional Practice, Appraisal Institute of Canada (Ottawa)
Vice President, IT Operations, B2B Trust (Toronto)
Vice President Finance (Senior Financial Offider), Goodwill Industries of Alberta (Edmonton)
Coordinator, Membership and Trade Issues, Canadian Association of Chain Drug Stores (Toronto)
President and CEO, Goodwill Industries of Alberta (Edmonton)
Director, Policy and Communications, New Brunswick Medical Society (Fredericton)
Director, Chapter and Member Services, Confidential (Toronto)
Director, Government Affairs, Canada’s Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (Ottawa)
Director, Government Relations and Advocacy – Ontario, Canadian Diabetes Association (Toronto)
Bilingual Marketing Coordinator, Interio Designers of Canada (Toronto)
Chief Financial Officer, Heart & Stroke Foundation (Ottawa)
Manager, Communications and Regional Programs, Canadian Payroll Association (Toronto)
Executive Director, The Vimy Foundation (Montreal)
Executive Director, Ontario Society (Coalition) of Senior Citizens’ Associations (Toronto)
Registrar / CEO, College of Registered Nurses of British Columbia (Vancouver)
Director of Corporate Development, Canadian Cancer Society (Toronto)
Director of Health Information Services (Health Records), Humber River Regional Hospital (Mississauga, Ontario)
Director, Policy, Economic and Environmental Affairs, The Railway Association of Canada (Ottawa)
Communications & Membership Services Coordinator, Ontario Association of Veterinary Technicians (Guelph, Ontario)
Communications Coordinator, Canadian Nursery Landscape Association (Missisauga, Ontario)
General Manager, Greater Vancouver Food Bank Society (Vancouver)
Executive Director, Canadian Bar Association Alberta Branch (Calgary)
Public Relations Specialist (Bilingual), Rubber Association of Canada (Mississauga, Ontario)
Executive Director, BC Floor Covering Association (British Columbia)
Registrator / CEO, College of Massage Therapists of BC (Vancouver)
Team Lead, Certification, Canadian Payroll Association (Toronto)
Program Coordinator, Canadian Investor Relatinos Institute (Toronto)
Governance and Corporate Affairs Coordinator, Ontario Dental Association (Toronto)
Executive Director, MAB-Mackay Foundation (Montreal

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment